Checks Keep BEHR Bullish & Safe
by President & CEO Magazine, August 2001
BEHR Process Corp. manufactures
premium-quality architectural coatings such
as paints, stains and varnishes for the
do-it-yourself market. BEHR is headquartered
in Santa Ana, Calif., with distribution
facilities throughout North America. The
company claims many firsts in its innovative
53-year history, such as being the first to
introduce custom-color matching in the
marketplace. For the past decade, the
company has experienced accelerated growth,
doubling sales every 30 months. For Edie
Miller, vice president of human resources at
BEHR, this has meant growing the employee
population of the company from 98 to more
than 1,300 in just the past 12 years.
Anyone who has experienced such expansion
knows well that growth brings its own
special problems. For Miller, this
particularly has meant finding not only the
desired quantity of appropriately skilled
employees but also finding quality employees
who would excel and help to drive the
company growth. Additionally, the new hires
had to fit the corporate culture and
successfully interact with the staff already
in place. “Recruiting is an art that
combines objective and subjective elements,”
says Miller. “The challenge is to find those
individuals who will best serve and fit the
organization and, at the same time, to avoid
hiring those who would harm the corporation
and its employees. Throughout the employment
process, there is a need to verify the
information the employment representative is
receiving.”
In some fields, such as health care,
security and teaching, background checks are
legally required. In other fields where
employees have access to customer homes and
property,
background screening is a virtual
necessity even though it’s not a legal
requirement. Companies operating in these
fields have found out by observing
court-levied penalties that it’s safer to
check out employees at a fairly nominal cost
than to bear legal risks, which could bring
them to bankruptcy.
With these considerations in mind, Miller
knew that she wanted to add the services of
a professional screening company to the
hiring process at BEHR. “I realized from the
onset that there is questionable validity to
a character test, but there are behaviors
that a person has evidenced, whether
positive or not, and these should be part of
the consideration in hiring them,” she says.
Miller’s choice was
InfoLink Screening Services Inc., a firm
with national capabilities whose home office
is in Chatsworth, Calif. “I met
Barry Nadell, the president of InfoLink,
at an employment law conference in January
1995,” says Miller. “Barry had a very simple
display and presentation, but I recognized
he was offering exactly what we needed. We
worked with InfoLink to develop a standard
package of background checks for employees,
along with some expanded packages for
particular positions in the company.” Miller
adds that 100 percent of their employees in
the United States and Canada are screened.
Similar to conducting background
investigations, BEHR also conducts
post-offer pre-employment
drug tests for all employees. “As the
company grew, setting up test sites became
increasingly problematic, especially where
we only had one person to be tested, say a
potential sales representative,” says
Miller. “Again, InfoLink was able to provide
a service to BEHR. InfoLink has the ability
to arrange test sites throughout the United
States at a competitive rate and in a timely
manner.” The relationship between BEHR and
InfoLink continues today.
“Competitive pricing and a full range of
services are normal considerations and part
of the picture,” says Miller. “Another
important element is keeping abreast of the
law. Barry Nadell is very proactive in
keeping his clients informed of changes in
laws and regulations. Another important
concern is confidentiality. InfoLink has
introduced an online version of their
service, and we switched from the fax
machine to the Internet. This is a more
secure process than before. We take
precautions with our screening results. The
distribution of information is very limited.
In order to be fair, whenever there are
negative findings that may influence our
hiring decision, we send a copy to the
applicant by registered mail and invite them
to clarify or correct the negative
information contained in the report.”
Looking back over the past 12 years, Miller
believes that the decision to use InfoLink
has been an important contribution to the
company’s ability to employ the best. “By
using an outside screening firm, we get the
information we want at a reasonable price,
and we save time,” concludes Miller.
© 2002
Hughes Communications, Inc.
|